At Arm’s Length From Prosperity

Should India's defence production industry be fully opened to private Indian players?

India is the world's largest arms importer, spending nearly 70% of our defence expenditure on purchases from foreign players and accounting for 12% of total global arms imports. The hold of the public sector over the domestic defence manufacturing industry is total, monopolistic and highly lacking in excellence. In light of the recently successful test run of Tejas, India's new lightweight jet fighter, after a delay of 30 years and an excessively overrun budget, we asked you if you felt the defence production sector in India should be fully opened to private players. The results are not surprising. 89% of respondents have said yes. What could be their reasons? Firstly, the entry of private players increases competition leading to much higher quality and the much needed innovation in this industry. Secondly, self-reliance in the defence sector is highly crucial to prevent heavy dependence on foreign entities, especially during times of conflict when any foreign relation could have soured. Further, as a report released by the CII and BCG suggests, over a million jobs would be created by opening up the defence production industry. On the other hand, there are understandable concerns that failure to monitor this industry could jeopardize national security. But that concern will be more applicable to foreign sellers as Boeing, GE and Dassault Aviation who we buy from, than to a domestic private industry. Military expenditure is high on India's budget allocation, and the regular delay and non compliance of budget limitations is not just unjustifiable waste of tax payers' money but also an obstacle to our defence preparedness. Hopefully, India will soon follow through with the Defence Production Policy which promotes 70% private participation in defence. Despite the enthusiasm that surrounded it's launch, it is in a state of drift with no concerted and sustained effort being made to put this policy into practice.

Similar Posts

  • Are We Man Enough?

    Should male rapes be brought within the definition of rape? The pressure of public opinion brought about several welcome changes to the Indian criminal law in the 2013 amendment. It widened the scope of the definition of rape of a woman, expanded the list of sexual offences and increased the punishment for the offences. However,…

  • Hi-Tech Polic(y)ing

    Assuming a robust IT infrastructure can be put in place, will a facility to file FIRs online be a viable solution to this problem? 61% of you said that if introduced the online FIR could help improve the accountability of police against 27% of you who felt that it would increase the burden on police…

  • Wronging Gay Rights

    How would you categorize the recent Supreme Court verdict on Section 377? The recent Supreme Court upholding of Article 377 has sparked widespread reaction across the nation. So we dedicated last week's Saturday Poll to understanding our level of acceptance for sexual minorities and to what extent the petitioners in the case were representative of…

  • Silence of the Law

    In last week’s Saturday Poll, we had asked you whether the right to freedom of speech should include the right to express contrarian views on religion. A mere 8% of the poll takers said it should, against a whopping 92% who feel that the right to express contrarian views should not be considered part of…

  • Whistle in the light

    In a world which glorifies vigilantism, how many people would come forward to expose a crime putting their lives and safety at stake? In last week's Saturday Poll, we asked you whether you would expose a corrupt authority if you had evidence against them and what factor would influence your decision most. A meagre 8%…

  • Should we kill death?

    Is the unavoidable politicisation of the execution of death sentence a good enough reason to abolish death sentence? In the last Saturday Poll, we had posed the question whether politicization of the execution of death sentence is a good enough reason to ban death penalty. 85% of the 41 poll takers said “no”. Clearly, most…